This necessarily implies that every low-cost/low-feature disruptor model has the potential to bring actual disruption. While technically true, this is not more insightful than the truism that everyone has the potential to become the U.S. president.
One’s …
… come from the likelihood of disruption, not the possibility of disruption. You avoided sharing your opinion about this likelihood, and discouraged others from sharing theirs, by saying that …
How would that help further the discussion?