I agree with the concerns about disruption. Obsidian’s merits are besides the point; disruption doesn’t require just one disruptor.
As enough lower-level pieces become commodified, developers start seeing how to integrate or reimagine the incumbent’s remaining standout features.
In the classic low-cost/low-feature disruptor model, every immediate decision of the expensive/high-end incumbent makes sense and their customers are happy right up until the revolutionized market threatens viability of the business.
@korm was hoping to shut down any further discussion by insulting everyone, but I’m still posting this because I do want DT4 and DT5 to be big financial successes with surprising, trend-setting features.